So 10 quotes from you saying that I (along with others) should be banned isn't evidence of you saying we should be banned ? I didn't even have to dig that much to find those, they were all on a couple of pages. Don't forget there were also the times you called for bannings over Vegas-gate and Avatar-gate. #grass
^^^^^^^rattled We've already done this HIAG, at first I thought you were different posters, but over time it became clear this was your sock. The evidence of it being so, stacked up with every post you made with it. So I admitted to Fosse that I'd called it wrong. I can't wait for the horrendous owning you're going to receive when you get unmasked after ****ing up one day with your proxy IP
No, you just jumped on the bandwagon, as always, sheep. The 'pundits you like and dislike thread' is ample evidence of your follow the herd ways. http://www.not606.com/threads/pundits-you-like-and-dislike.341795/ From this comment on the first page you seem to have nailed your colours to the mast Yet, 3 pages in after many pl board regulars ( a few of whom you notoriously rim and mindlessly follow) had contributed you decide to interject with your own opinion and follow the crowd having blatantly branded it a **** thread on the first page. Sheep, you have been rumbled
You seem keen to dodge the example I've brought up, sheep, and by no means coincidentally your crowd is absent
What post are you talking about, sheep? They are all addressed to me as far as I can see Nice deflection tactics trying to move away from the rumbling you have just received btw. I'm sure you won't have to bide too much more time before your crowd and carers arrive to try and rescue you from this pickle you find yourself in. You really do get picked apart when you try and go it alone, sheep
The one you quoted i.e. this one; It's a **** thread HIAG, go **** yourself please log in to view this image Give it up HIAG you daft twat
Are you talking about the post I quoted you addressing me as hiag, sheep? Read the first page of the thread and you will see you were addressing me as hiag as you usually do. You know this though and are trying to deflect from the colossal rumbling you have suffered
If I didn't know better I'd say that post is exactly the sort of bollocks I'd expect HIAG to write. Oh actually I do know better, hello HIAG As for the 'rumbling' I've supposedly received, that's another wum **** up, as my first post on that thread was a pisstake of you me old mucker. When an actual discussion did end up breaking out, I made a couple of posts on the subject iirc. And what? How does that constitute a 'rumbling'? To claim such nonsense is not at all HIAG's MO is it HIAG? Oh wait #rumblegate
That would be the 8th post down on this thread http://www.not606.com/threads/pundits-you-like-and-dislike.341795/page-3 if I am not mistaken As you can see you are not addressing hiag. You're quoting me, Saintsfan08.! Sheep aren't known to be the brightest of animals tbf
Quoting the sock account, addressing the owner of it, yes HIAG well done What part of Ireland was it again? You got any kids mate? 2 perhaps - aged 6,10 and 14? Maybe you'd like to swear on their lives that you're not Hoddle is a God on here mate?
Nice try, sheep. What you are ignoring, and what I've quoted you as saying in the 8th post is that it is 'a **** thread' and once the crowd started offering there opinions, surprise surprise, so did you. The lies you are coming out with only confirm your pain at the hands of this rumbling
That's not what you were implying a few posts ago, to the excitement of a couple of crowd members you pander to
