Is exaggerating to cover your mistake? What two dozen posts telling people they are knobs? I criticized posters who deliberately choose to ignore what I wrote and misrepresent me. I have just proven that with them; just as I have now done it with you, a thousand times.
Just curious about your experience, as you seem to be very ready to judge that of others without any real idea of what the reality of theirs is.
I've no idea what you're asking. I thought you'd gone rather over the top telling loads of people they were idiots, I made a perfectly civil request that you ceased doing so, there's no legal requirement to do so.
The nature of my experience is irrelevant, as is the 'reality of theirs'. If someone's talking nonsense (as Sterling was when it came to drug-related deaths, based on working in a morgue, his mum being a social worker, and his uncle being a copper) they need putting right with some insight and facts.
Bloody hell, that's a bit of backpeddling, but why not . By the way, it was only three people, who were having a ****ing good dig at me first. Do you only read my posts? (Now where have I sen that before ...) Bye.
Nothing I posted referred to anything Sterling discussed; I was very careful to keep my distance as I thought it trivial. None of what you have posted at me has anything to do with Sterling. Life has many shades and the world of social drugs, or unsocial drugs, basks in most of them. I cerainly agree it's not Grange Hill and most folk have no real idea just how bad it can be.
So what exactly did you mean when you said "you seem to be very ready to judge that of others without any real idea of what the reality of theirs is"?
You have pigeon holed posters yet you have no idea of their experience; it just seems to be judgemental. I took the trouble to ask what your expetience was to qualify you to do that.
I 'pigeonholed' them on the strength of what the comments they were making, that's all. Some of them did seem very unenlightened.
And you counted me into that and you were wrong, but you ignored my reasonable answers and continued to post nonsense about my views. I think I had every right to challenge you on that.
Have you seen the title of the thread? Why read it if you don't want to read a discussion about drugs? What did you expect? What harm has it done? Let it wash by you, you're taking it far to seriously, go take a pill or something.
I've no problem with the thread. I read all the threads (in fact I read every post on every thread, as moderator I feel I'm obliged to do so). I expected what happened. I take nothing too seriously.
I believe that the social use of drugs should be managed in far more intelligently and far more responsibily. That doesn't mean I think they are good or clever, just as I think that someoneone who bases their argument on drink and drugs being equally bad, is not seeing the reality of it all. See above. I like the way you say that I'm full of ****, but then agree with me, then pretend that you haven't. I have not levelled abuse at you throughout these proceedings, but you sir are a massive cockwomble.
