I can arrange for him to "go away" but it'll cost a lot and it'll have to be kept secret...**** this isn't a PM. I'll make some calls and get back to you.
Oh, come on, Bod! You know how this works. I start a thread, or I make a reply to an existing thread, neither mentioning Pixie or any of his lapdogs nor alluding to any of them, and I get the usual ****wits piling on with their ****wittery. You have seen this firsthand, for yourself. How about this for a rule... NONE OF PIXIE, RODDERS, SKIDDY, BAMBI, JOHNNY BOY, OR FLANDERS MAKES ANY REPLY TO MY POSTS UNLESS I MAKE A COMMENT ABOUT THEM, AND ONLY THE PERSON I MAKE A COMMENT ABOUT HAS THE RIGHT TO REPLY. SANCTION FOR BREACH: IMMEDIATE 1 WEEK BAN. How about that for an idea?
Shut it you ... you're just an "M" substituting a "Z" away from having an appropriate board name fella
HIAG's best placed to tell you ... he's got a whole drawer full of non-matching ones (or more accurately - none going to matches ones )
No, Rodders, it isn't. The one and only time I "asked" for a ban, was on this board, on a public thread, in full view of my peers. It was done, reluctantly, to demonstrate my complete and utter frustration at all the pathetic "sock" comments. It would have been plain for all to see that my "asking" for a ban of the two main culprits was very much a last resort. That cannot, in any manner, shape, or form, be compared with the sneaky and snide way in which Pixie went crawling to the supermods, and lied and deceived his way in to getting me banned, so desperate was he to silence me.
Rodders (aka Tobes, the market-stall trader) has convinced himself that I and @Saintsfan08 are one and the same poster, and a small handful of ****wits (Pixie, Skiddy, and Bambi being chief among them) have jumped on the wum-bandwagon.
Surely the greatest wumming of all time?? ... had you crying like a baby and demanding bans .... and why exactly???? ... where was the heinous crime??? Soft Twat @Bodinki
It was the hilariously funny conclusion to the Gimps sock being outed. Read the thread it's not 606 gold mate.
You've asked for me to be banned on at least 2 occasions Nigel. Still swerving that post I see..... #shocked
We've convinced ourselves as it's as plain as day HIAG, you're a ****e wumster and your sock account is pathetic I gave you an 'out' yesterday love, you've swerved it. http://www.not606.com/threads/is-hiag-a-complete-bell-end.341967/page-18#post-10240727
