Both decisions were correct ? Get to **** .. even Clattenburg has come out and said he got it wrong .. bottled it on the professional foul as well .. we don't need luck .. we just need a level playing field and correct decisions
You're right re Robbo, he's so one footed. Surely you'd be better with a right footed player on the post. Jak shouldn't, he only did 'cos we were chasing the game, so he's allowed one, good time to get it out of the way. Seemed a tad shaky today. And yes Walcott is a twat.
The referee disagrees with you about the first goal and don't try to justify a foul goal and a player not walking by saying we fouled a lot!!
He didn't move his hand or anything towards it, and it was right on the top of his arm anyway. When it suits the refs handball has to be deliberate. When it's a plucky small side blocking one on the line they get such a boner for crushing hopes with a red card and a penalty. You'll struggle to find a harsher handball given.
Clucas stopped the ball going in with him arm, there was never any chance of it not being a red, it's automatic.
Come on mate ffs. I understand it wasn't intentional by Sanchez, we all do. It's not the point though. The ball flew into the net as a result of direct contact with his hand. Free kick, no yellow card as it wasn't intentional. Easy decision, there's really no debating it at all. And as for Gibbs....... well it speaks for itself. He must have a special agreement with his mate "Mark"
The ****ing wallys prattling on about no intent for the handball, if your hands are up and away from the body and the ball hits it 9.9 times out of 10 its a handball, behave yourselfs
Look where it hit him and look at how little movement there actually was. It's just hit him on the shoulder! It's not even ball to hand, it was ball to extreme upper arm.
No it was 100% not a hand ball. I don't know what a hand ball is but let's see what every pundit and professional has to say after the game shall we? Everyone on here is wrong.
