While I think Bruce could certainly get tactics wrong I also think players sometimes just didn't play for him too. And for the money they get I think they should always give their all. Maybe Bruce could be a bit too soft also. Huddlestone was definitely a player he wanted to play. I want to see this play continue even in situations where we aren't in danger of going down. I remember how with an FA Cup final to play the players decided to agree not to bother with the final month or two of league games that season.
He's done better than previously but that's not saying too much. He still scares the **** out of me when running back behind a striker and clipping his heels in the box.
Agree. I watched him playing in the PL for Tottenham. Had 1 world class game then faded into good to average. Came here and had 1 world class game against Fulham. Then a repeat of his Tottenham days. Has all the attributes to be a really great player. I feel he has never reached his full potential and as a football lover for me that is so sad to see.
i thought it was some kind of ironic self-reference to itself. the your and you're (since both occur) are the wrong way round as i type. i expect a hand will be held up before long.
I dont think anyone on here was guilty of trashing Thudd. MP had them playing good, attractive football, but it was ineffective, thats all.
nah, you can do it. the title currently says holding you're hand up when your wrong when it should say holding your hand up when you're wrong and it's all about manfully admitting you were wrong, so getting the title wrong could be seen as either deliberately wry or unfortunately inappropriate. or something.
