it was January you could have signed him he was on loan with you if he was on loan at another club you would have had to pay up his contract to release him
Yes but he is on a season long loan,so to sign him now if WJ is right,we would have to pay him till the season end then pay him again on his new contract.which would mean an extra £500,000 if he's on £20,000 a week.
so you could have signed a player some say is worth 12million for 3.5 million but you didnt because you did not want to pay 500k to release him from yourselves
I believe he's signed a pre contract,which starts the day the loan finishes.Maybe above your IQ don't forget WJ's in Mensa.
Pontus signed on loan because Leeds wanted him to prove his fitness before committing to a full time deal .. Torino agreed to 22 matches to trigger a £3.5m transfer fee .. the deal was that Leeds could make it a permanent move anytime after the clause was triggered, including at the end of the season .. no letter of intent here, just a hard and fast contract now signed by Pontus, Leeds and Torino that says Leeds pay £3.5m in June and that's that .. I really don't understand why people keep looking for trouble with this deal when there isn't anything there .. Pontus is a Leeds player until June 2020 .. can we just accept it, and also accept that the club is on the up and we're looking really strong this season .. come on people, get a grip Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Over the past 10 years negativity has been the safe bet. That is now changing and I've got the second easiest fiver I've ever earned (my mam once gave me a fiver for no reason).
Did she tell you to go the shop and don't rush back,leaving just her and your dad in the house.old trick that one.
Let's hope so. Then we can all accept he is just 'mr wrong place at the wrong time any dishonest **** goes down man' and move on
Nor will I. If things were as portrayed then the permanent contract would have been offered and signed. It wasnt and there has to be reason for it.