No. The clue is in the word forum. Knives in back, making a statement and then being able to prove your point, debate and slaughter. That's a forum, discussion has no place in it. No one on here will accept that you have inside information, until you name your source. So there is no point in posting that you have one unless you are prepared to name them. One last point, when you do have a source and you want them to keep their job or stay as a friend, the last place that you should post anything is on here.
Maybe Burnley made a bid and made it public to make Norwich move on the Brady bid? It makes more sense! Like buying a car you make out you've other cars to look at that you like!
Its not rocket science is it.... signing on fee on a £10 million transfer say 750k...?... increase in salary for 3 years and you have a full back for close to £4 million... unless of course you want the money... Brilliant Robbo, Brilliant Silva....
You are spot on, a very good friend of mine who is well connected at Burnley text me this morning that was exactly what Burnley were doing, so not to worry they were after Brady.
I recommend 'A book on Contract Law' by Peter Saxton, forward by JR Hartley available at all good book shops was that facetious? but true Peter, you will often find, "under conditon of.."
My take on it is that most players only move on for career progression......you can't actually think Burnley is progression !! If a decent Premiership club came in for him I'm sure Robbo would be off like a shot
Of course not. Today, during Patty's and my own absence, on the transfer thread, on deadline day, it seems to have been mainly about food and related spending power. Go figure.
It was a false alarm. Our second grandson (the first died of SIDS at 3 months, three years ago) will join our 6 granddaughters anytime between NOW and Feb 14, when our daughter will otherwise be induced. Anxious times we're going through at the moment! I'll post an announcement once he's arrived. Thanks for asking!
