No it was in context of it's a shame how his life has gone since he retired - he looks reasonably fit bodywise but he is ****ed mentally
Everytime I get a notification for this thread I get a little upset and concerned....... that one of you has had a direct hit and won some points!
hey man, get down off that horse, it's far too high for you. I was just asking as surely there're good points there to be had and you're playing, whereas I haven't put any names in at all, not even Frankie van der Elst after he was admitted into hospital a couple of weeks ago (good points there). I just wanted to see how low the level of moral decay was on here.
Funny thread. Separates the genuinely funny risque personalities from the 'Orrible classless bastards who'll throw kids into the mix just to try and out shock everybody else showing themselves for true ****s they are. Anybody taken Charles Bradley?
So... Charlie Manson - February Charles Bradley- December Wild card- Charlie Sheen with a non aids related death - September Year of the Charlie's.
Is there a minimum age limit on nominations when playing a points based centred on people dying soon? If I were base enough to play I would play to win. I also find it quite ironic that it's the Sunderland fans complaining about age, I didn't think minimum ages meant anything there.
They do. I'd say minimum age should be when children turn into adults. Work that out for yourself, if you are capable. It's you who is bringing kids into. Got something to tell us why you have little boys in your thoughts I'm calling nonce on this one.
I see, the kids from Sunderland, that's why you've got the arse. If he was from Liverpool would you nominate him? A black kid from London? How about if he was a Syrian refugee? and what's the difference between a kid dying and an adult, apart from the adult leaving far more people lamenting the loss? As to 'nonce' meh, call me what you want if you feel it deflects from your hypocrisy enough.
