When providing the information under Rule 13 Hull City would have taken the monthly cost of the seat, times it by 12 and sent that to the Premier League. The result is the same, the price is set in stone until the new season.
James Mooney has been replaced by Tom Rowell (who seems to be a clone of James Mooney), but the others haven't actually left yet, they're all working off three month notice periods.
Why would they have multiplied it by 12? It can last for as short or as long as the purchaser wishes, subject to the notice period.
There were other words ther, within the same sentence that adequately put the sentiment into context. You're splitting hairs for no obvious reason.
Huh? I just quoted your entire quote There were no other words, so no other context I'm not splitting hairs, I was simply replying to your entire post. Re read it. It was very clear ... I just posted it all
We pay over 12 months so the cost for a season is the monthly payment times 12. We'll soon know as we are getting close to the time they have to give us 3 months notice for next season.
Quite a big other I do think the Trust should be continuing chasing the PL on their decision on that ( or did they formally announce they were allowing it? I forget)
The club has no power to change the price of a season ticket (membership) during the season unless it hands over its Premier League share. So the answer is no.
I think PLT said the club could reduce the price by a pound so the Premier League ignored it. This is why I suggested a campaign to give the Premier League more teeth to enforce concessions.