The EU debate - Part III

No anger, just pity.
Nobody wins, someone is going to lose there job. If you feel mocking that on an Internet forum makes you big and clever, then that says more about you than me.

 

It's a silly question, that falls for stumpy's attempt to shift things to try stop people seeing he was wrong yet again. How thick must you be to repeatedly fall for it.

 

There's nothing silly about it. You actually would make him look wrong by proving it rather than all this posturing.

 

@brb

All of stan the snide's posts now appear as having been made by my account. I feel dirty...

 

You really are a simple soul aren't you. It's really **** all to do with the age thing, it's irrelevant. You're simply falling for stumpy's spin...again.

 

Rejig what question?

And what was this supposed **** up?

You strange old man

 

It was a conversation entirely about your respective ages. Again, you're doing nothing but posturing. I don't care how old you two are but I'd have guessed you're about 58 and Tobes a decade younger. Why not just prove he's wrong rather than telling him he is when he probably isn't?

 

He said he'd ban anyone who grassed on this forum

Bye mate

 

Stop wriggling and have some dignity for once in your life wee fella. Read the post and reply instead of desperately trying your usual diversions and twists to cover being wrong. You're only fooling one simpleton.

 

**** you stumpy you clown

 

Was it **** you thick twat.

 

More posturing because you're probably wrong.

I need to get ready for the match. I trust you'll be doing the same soon.

 

You really are a tit. You've once again jumped in with no real idea, and are now trying to drag out a 'debate' that never happened.

 

You're speaking in riddles again old fella.

Spell out exactly what you mean and I'll respond with a straightforward answer, same as always.

 

No one likes a grass, you sexual deviant

 

I mean precisely what I said. It's crystal clear. You try to make claims and assumptions based on postings, and regularly get it wrong.

You then tend to try and focus on one element, even shifting that, in order to try to cover up being wrong.

You're **** at deductions, and poor at wriggling.

Like you, it's really very simple and not a big thing.

 

He only has massive slices of anything

 

Reporting ****wits isn't grassing. It's why the board has some rules.

 

Oh noooo! I so wanted to be liked by a stumpy failure of an SJW from the North East that spends all day every day trying to pretend he has a life beyond thumping his keyboard on a football forum

 

Yet more nothingness

Spell out what assumptions I've got wrong old fella, and why, it's not complicated