Off Topic HIAG's new "Bambi" picture!

And my point is in the last , and most important years because they are the latest with both clubs without a league title win and neck and neck .... In the last 5 seasons Arsenal have a net spend of 200 million ....The Spurs , 5.5 million ...you can dance around these latest figures all you want but it doesn't,t make it any less hilarious as you hold onto your " World Class players like Ozil " without results .And to add insult to injury , over the past 4 seasons Arsenal has spent more than a quarter million £'s in wages

 

You should have read my initial comment then rather than picking out arbitrary years

 

Here your original statement after me saying The Spurs fans must be basking ....you could have said " Since the Premier League began " ... But you didn't,t ..Anyways , do you have any comment about the finacial ways of late between The Gunners and Spurs without either winning a league title ? ... My guess is not

 

...don't be ridiculous...Rufus's use of the English language is far superior...

 

I could have, but I chose a different way to express the same thing. I'll try and make things easier for you to understand in future

 

Well ....money well spent then ...cheers

 

We've earned the cash we've spent, and haven't relied on being bankrolled by a sugar daddy to win all of those trophies, so yes it is, thanks

 

Dont try and use sense to explain to fools mate.
What Hiag fails to appreciate is that for all the money Spurs have spent they have **** all in return in real terms.

 

What these dense Gunners cannot grasp is that two people might well have the money to blow on a brand new Ferrari, but if one of them doesn't have anything spare to be able to afford to keep it on the road, he's not going to be able to cover as many miles as the one who can.

Arsenal and Spurs may well have had the same pot of money to buy a Ferrari each, but the plain fact is that Arsenal spent considerably more in running costs, and yet have absolutely **** all to show for it over the past decade.

 

So just to kick this ****e analogy into touch, not only have Arsenal earned the money to buy the Ferrari, they've also had the money to maintain it and win two major races in it during the time period you mention.

Whilst the Spuds finish in the 'also rans' somewhere down the grid.

Another wum **** up clocked up for you

 

Compared to Spurs who have nothing to show for their spending for the last 50+ years !
you really are **** at this aren't you

 

That's the whole point of my analogy, you complete twat!

Arsenal and Spurs both having had the money to each buy a Ferrari counts for nothing if Spurs didn't have the money, nor did they spend the money, to keep it on the road. Arsenal did, and yet have won **** all over the last decade - except a couple of poxy domestic trophies which European giants couldn't give a **** about.

 

^^^^^^^^ clearly rattled

 

Rattled.

Spurs' Ferrari is constantly in the garage mate, either having new parts or a new driver. None of which has made a ****ing jot of difference, you're still 'also rans'

 

So Arsenal didn't win any trophies over the last decade, but they did win two trophies over the last decade. Which one is it @Hoddle Is A God ?

#ferrari-gate

 

Who needs a Ferrari when we now have Poch at the wheel of the Mighty Spurs Juggernaut! Gooners and Chav alike **** their keks when they hear the roar of its mighty engine, and are dazzled by the beam of its powerful headlights!

 

I don't care, Pixie.

What I do know is Le Vieux Fou hasn't won either the Prem title or the CL in over a decade.

That is pitiful, given the amount of money that your club has blown on wages.

 

So it isn't a Ferrari after all, it's a lumbering Leyland DAF. Bulky, slow, expensive and looks like ****.

Seems about right.

 

You reek of defeat HIAG

Might as well hoist the Picard now and be done with it.

 

With Poch at the wheel, mate, he could be driving a Transit Van and you'd still **** your pants.