The EU debate - Part III

Bizarre decision. Pardew?

 

Asking for you to commit to an opinion, which you've still not given, wasn't looking for anything barring you actually saying what you genuinely think for once.

The only person seeking the 'win' is you, hence the reason you've done your usual Dutch faux victory dance.

 

Rowett I reckon

 

What the **** would I be trying to win?

Some dumb **** made a daft claim, then thought he'd struck gold with a quote, until he realised it didn't back his claim at all.

You jumped in and showed your ignorance and desperation.

He was only trying to divert from his earlier **** up.

He posted my opinion, I've posted others since, you're hoping nobody noticed and once again trying to repeat a lie in the hope it somehow magically becomes true.

 

You're batshit mental pal

 

Bizarre? Have you seen the results and stats?

 

Why, for pointing out you're clueless and spouting ****e yet again?

 

Yes. He's got a dreadful squad to work with. To be three points off 17th isn't bad at all when you've got Mbokani up front.

 

I hope not. Good manager.

 

If he attacked like he defends, we'd get more goals.

 

You got that right!...

 

Current evidence suggests we have grossly underestimated our impact on the climate, particularly the increase in methane. As far as I'm concerned the increase in temperatures over the last 50 years is solely man made, the 11 year solar cycle, plus the longer Mylankovitch cycles have been discounted.
Last thing I read showed sea level rises in the last couple of years have been double what was modeled because expansion due to warming of the oceans had been underestimated.

 

No doubt the argument will be that the UK ambassador to the EU doesn't know what he's talking about when it comes to negotiating a deal for the UK with the EU.

"The UK's ambassador to the EU urged British colleagues in Brussels to challenge "muddled thinking and... speak truth to power" as he quit ahead of Brexit talks, the BBC has learnt.

Writing to staff, Sir Ivan Rogers said ministers needed to hear "unvarnished" and "uncomfortable" views from Europe."

 

All very well, mate, but it's the unvarnished truth that May and the three ****wits don't want to hear.

So, instead, they've shot the messenger!

 

Perhaps you could have a word with her?

 

There doesn't seem to be any point Dull. Her Ambassador to the EU tried to have a word with her and was ignored. She seems to be made up of a combination of arrogance, stubbornness, inconsistency and incompetence.

 

Did you really post that? You? ****inell

 

I think the point was that you can tell what sort of scumbag Farage is by the scumbags he surrounds himself with. To be honest, his tragic rimming of Donald Trump should be evidence enough of that.

 

With all these people, I wonder how much their public persona matches their genuine beliefs. Farage and Trump are great at telling people what they want to hear but I doubt they believe it themselves most of the time.

 

I think it's a pretty safe bet that the only thing Farage truly believes in is Farage, while the only thing in the universe that ruly moved Trump is Trump. That is, until their eyes met across an empty room.