The EU debate - Part III

WTF has skin colour got to do with it, you are a Sad Stan light, look at yourself in the mirror its ugly as ****.

Also Brexit was a full leave, everyone said as such, why cant you accept that, remember you voted to leave, or did you just lie on that, to look billy big balls?

 

We vote for the party and its manifesto, its not hard to understand that, unless it upsets you, as obviously it does to you.

 

You vote for your local MP.

May criticised Brown for being an unelected MP. Another example of her inconsistency.

All of which has little to do with the fact that the reasons behind Gina Miller's high court case have gone straight over your empty head.

You should stick to wishing a 2017 death on other posters. That's about your level, same as Tiddler and his sexual assault threats.

The voices of Brexit Britain

 

It's not that long ago, the claims were that the markets hate uncertainty, and yet now they're in favour of a woman creating uncertainty. Disney couldn't invent these carachters.

 

Disney certainly couldn't invent something as a Dull, bitter, and twisted as you. Or your lousy spelling!...

 

"Thhhuuunk"..That's the sound of you missing the point.

We have voted to jump off a cliff. But because we have yet to hit the ground, Brexit voters are saying "see, it's all okay. Where's the disaster the so called experts predicted?"

Having had this pointed out to you, you now try to claim equivalence between the pro and anti Brexit arguments. You are basically saying "let's wait until we hit the ground before we decide who is right and who is wrong". This is because you have allowed yourself, in this post-truth era, to be persuaded that all arguments are merely opinions and yours is as valid as anyone else's.

But gravity is not an opinion; anyone with any grasp of reality right now is looking for a parachute.

 

I don't believe you're that thick Dull although you are playing to a very thick audience in Kustard.

The markets don't like uncertainty so they don't like May's "it's a secret" Brexit strategy. They do like Miller's push for greater transparency as that will provide more certainty.

But you knew all that really, you were just trying to steal a like off of the forum's Brummie ****wit

Edit: success Dull, well done!

 

Cool brexit story Bro.

 

If any of that is what I was saying, you'd have the start of a point. As it wasn't, it's just a lot of words saying nothing.

 

Usual bollocks.

It must be apparent to you that the markets like Gina Miller because she's attempting to hold May and her increasingly hapless, secretive, and downright incompetent colleagues to account.

She quite rightly is taking May & co to court over their blatant attempts to ignore the law and the rule of parliament by ramming through some half arsed form of Brexit that will leave the U.K. In an even worse state economically.

 

The first two words summed the rest of your post up.

 

Anything you fail to understand is pretty much "just a lot of words saying nothing". I expect you experience that sensation quite frequently.

 

You really are a fool, Dull.

 

But it will not provide more certainty in any great deal, all the banks care for is passporting and sod the rest. Also why would you give way your hand at a poker table?
And you say you work for yourself, dam it must be a failing company.

 

It's not a game of poker Kustard. In fact it's not a game at all.

It will provide a lot more certainty as it's easier to prepare for the future when you know what the future may hold, either good or bad.

 

They just make it up a they do along, I think 2017 will be the year of many bites from the remainers here.

Sad Stan and Heart attack Tobes could cause an argument with themselves and still lose.
Watford is confused little boy who cant think for himself.

I think Tobes will bite the most, he is so easy to wind up

 

Usually colour would have nothing to do with it but you're proudly racist and ignorant and just happen to be outraged by Gina Miller without the first clue about what she's doing so it's reasonable logic that you'd have less of an issue if she was a white man.

As I've replied to your same point various times, if Brexit was that clear we wouldn't have the Tories bickering over it six months down the line. Clearly it was very unclear- intentionally so IMO.

 

I understand what you are saying, but you cant give away your hand until A50 has started, yes you are probably right about the gov and having a clue, but they need to have multiple options ready, not one fixed plan. They need to be fluid. Plan A fails go to plan B etc.

 

If I changed my avatar to Hull's you'd agree with me for at least two pages.

 

You said you understood and then made it clear you don't have a clue all in the first sentence.