The EU debate - Part III

I think Cameron went the wrong way about it if he wanted changes.

 

please log in to view this image

 

The claim made by one of your disciples was that at least those 2 had claimed there should be zero immigration. Is that so hard for you to understand or are you just trying on your usual bollocks of spin & deflect?

Even you must realise what an embarrassment you are at times

 

Probably, it certainly didn't work the way he tried it.

What way do you see that he could have approached it that may have worked?

 

Not turning up as a desperate man begging for scraps would've helped.

The EU is what it is because previous leaders signed agreements. He should've waited for our presidency to start and put the whole immigration, free movement and levels of beauocracy control on the table as our agenda.

 

No not at all.

Cameron wanted a 'deal' for the UK, and came back with a compromise on what he set out looking for.

We have the power of veto, we opted out of the Euro. Any move to genuine federal Europe would have to passed through the democratic channels and we wouldn't have accepted it, and veto'd any attempt to include us in it

 

Is that a pic from your secret stash Tiddler?

 

My paddling pool.

 

What he got was a joke and not worth the paper it was written on.

 

Do you think that given the choice Zlatan the White Supremacist and KKKustard would want any immigration?

Kustard has said he'd tolerate small numbers, as long as they were highly skilled, but that's not the same as giving him the choice of none or some. Zlatan wouldn't want any more that dilute the honky majority.

 

Bullshit.

He got an exclusion for the UK for funding Eurozone bailouts

He also got a deal on limiting benefits access for EU migrants.

He also got an exclusion for the UK that for any new EU Treaties, any reference to an ever closer Union - will have a clear caveat that the ever closer Union does not apply to the UK

 

So we're now into personal insults.
I'm currently on my phone, so it's difficult to keep going backwards or forwards.
After my early exchanges with Paul, which seem to have been amicable, you got involved and at some part over the next few posts tried to tell me that I had become embroiled into a immigration discussion whether I realised it or not. I have now spent the last couple of hours telling you that I hadn't, as I was very careful with my initial wording and the comments were deliberate on my part. I'm not sure why this is so difficult to understand. That's the beauty of this type of forum, it's written words, which are clear for all to see.
I claimed (and stand by that claim) that (a) you don't like to be challenged, as was demonstrated in our recent exchanges over driverless vehicle exchanges and (b) you like to have the last word.
If you think I'm not going to respond to you, when you are clearly wrong, then I'm afraid that's not going to happen. I'm not sure how that is showing a pathetic level of insecurity, when all I have tried to do is refute your incorrect assertion.
Over to you...

 

Usual bollocks it is then.

You could have just agreed that they never made the claim instead of spinning yourself into the ground while trying to defend that lying ****er.

 

I was involved before you tool. You were responding to the video I posted and I was only interested in an amicable discussion until your aggressive response made false claims.
If you want to keep this drivel going on the basis that I made assumptions about you then you keep at it. My initial response was not offensive or aggressive, nor did it make false assumptions, so stop trying to play innocent and give it a rest.

 

You do realise that the MEPs had to vote on it and they did say they would/could reject it


http://openeurope.org.uk/today/blog...nt-scupper-david-camerons-renegotiation-deal/

 

Only I didn't say they made the claim tiddler, I just reminded you of their views on the subject.

If you'd have bother to read what I posted properly you'd have seen that.....

Ho hum

 

He came back with a finalised deal that took 3 years of negotiation.

 

I know you posted the video, but my comment was to Paul. Why you felt the need to add your two bobs worth is still beyond me but you did, it was incorrect, and now you don't seem to able to move on.
Your mask is definitely slipping, with the tool jibes, but if it you need it to somehow continue with the argument, feel free.
Your posts are now staring to portray a petulant child. At no point have I said you were either offensive or agreesive, just incorrect. I have not tried to claim innocence for anything, again another incorrect assumption. I know what and why I said what I said.
I think it's you that needs to give it a rest as your starting to look more and more foolish with every post.

 

It's a forum, if you don't like people adding their ha'penny them you are in the wrong place. Find yourself a private chat room dear fellow.