1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

World Cup: Fifa to expand competition to 48 teams

Discussion in 'Queens Park Rangers' started by kiwiqpr, Jan 10, 2017.

  1. QPR Oslo

    QPR Oslo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    21,448
    Likes Received:
    6,496
    Yepp!
    Kiwiiand against the 47th presently ranked? Why not. Then we could have Noggieland against the current 41st and Thailand against the No 2.

    There are 47 Countries there who could beat England on a good vintage!
     
    #21
    kiwiqpr likes this.
  2. kiwiqpr

    kiwiqpr Barnsie Mod

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    110,538
    Likes Received:
    215,306
    no real reason why the number 1 qualifying team of any confederation should not be at the world cup
     
    #22
  3. QPR247

    QPR247 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2011
    Messages:
    740
    Likes Received:
    174
    I'm not against the idea, football is a truely global sport, probably the only one and if going to a 48 team tournament allows some countries to participate who wouldn't ever normally get the chance, I don't see the problem.

    Look at the Euro's last year, it was expanded and some of the best moments came from countries that aren't normally there. Iceland being a great example, their fans were a fantastic part of the tournament. If an expanded World Cup means more fans get the opportunity to travel the world and see their country in the biggest football tournament possible then it must be a good idea, just because they might get spanked shouldn't come into it.

    It would still only be a maximum of 7 games for the finalists, like now, but with twice as many knockout games, which are more interesting than the group stages.

    Another thing I haven't heard mentioned is the possibility of multiple countries hosting the event. With 16 groups you could split that and the last 32 over 4 countries and then narrowed to 2 countries for the last 16 before the main host has the quarters, semi and finals. It would mean no country needing more than 4 quality stadiums (only 1 for the first stages) meaning less pressure, expense and major problems like we saw in Brazil and allow FIFA to appease the likes if Qatar without wasting a whole tournament on them. Yes, travel and logistics would be an issue but they were an issue in Brazil and I'd imagine the travelling and temperature changes across Russia next year would be no different than say having a couple of group games in China followed by a last 16 game in Europe of America. I appreciate it won't be particularly cost effective for fans but since when have FIFA or any FA given a toss about that anyway.
     
    #23
    kiwiqpr and QPR Oslo like this.
  4. sb_73

    sb_73 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    29,294
    Likes Received:
    26,720
    If it cuts down the interminable qualifying process that would be a plus too.
     
    #24
    kiwiqpr likes this.
  5. kiwiqpr

    kiwiqpr Barnsie Mod

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    110,538
    Likes Received:
    215,306
    World Cup: Gianni Infantino defends tournament expansion to 48 teams
    Fifa president Gianni Infantino has defended the expansion of the World Cup to 48 teams, insisting the change was based on "sporting merit" and not to make money.
    The sport's world governing body voted unanimously in favour of the change at a meeting in Zurich on Tuesday.
    Campaign group New Fifa Now described the expansion as "a money grab and power grab".
    But Infantino told the BBC: "It is the opposite, it's a football decision."
    He added: "Every format has advantages in financial terms. We were in a comfortable situation to take a decision based on sporting merit."
    An initial stage of 16 groups of three teams will precede a knockout stage for the remaining 32 with the change coming in for the 2026 tournament.
    According to Fifa research, revenue is predicted to increase to £5.29bn for a 48-team tournament, giving a potential profit rise of £521m.
    "This is a historic decision which marks the entrance of the World Cup into the 21st Century," added Infantino.
    'The quality could increase'
    The Football Association has urged Fifa to consider the needs of fans, players, teams and leagues and asked for more information on how the tournament would work, with Infantino admitting much of the detail has yet to be worked out.
    The European Club Association (ECA), which represents the interests of clubs at European level, reiterated it was against expansion. It said Fifa had made a political rather than a sporting decision.
    New Fifa Now says the governing body needs to reform, and that the change would "dilute the competitiveness of the tournament".
    Infantino, however, maintains the expansion will increase the quality of the teams in the competition.
    "Costa Rica eliminated England and Italy in the last World Cup, a good solid team and there are many other teams who could make it to the World Cup," he said.
    "I believe that the actual quality could rise, because many more countries will have the chance to qualify so they will invest in their elite football as well as grassroots."
    Responding to criticism from European clubs, Infantino added: "The game has changed. Football has now become a truly global game. Everyone is happy about investment in Europe, but what about helping outside Europe? They need to be open.
    "The key message from clubs I appreciate fully has always been don't touch the calendar, the dates of the World Cup or the burden for the players, and both these commissions fulfil them.
    "We will play 32 days like now, we play maximum seven matches like now, 12 stadiums, like now, but give the chance for more countries to dream."
    How it would work?
    The number of tournament matches will rise to 80, from 64, but the eventual winners will still play only seven games.
    The tournament will be completed within 32 days - a measure to appease powerful European clubs, who objected to reform because of a crowded international schedule.
    The changes mark the first World Cup expansion since 1998.
    Infantino said the decision on who will get the extra qualification slots has yet to be made but "this will be looked at speedily", adding: "The only sure thing is that everyone will have a bit more representation than they have."
    The president said he believed the World Cup could emulate what he felt was a successful Euro 2016 tournament, where the number of teams taking part was similarly increased.
    Qualifying for last year's tournament featured a record 53 nations, while the number of teams at the finals increased from 16 to 24.
    "It was the most interesting in the history of the European Championship," said Infantino.
    "All the other teams started to believe in their chance to qualify and play matches with a different mindset that they could qualify.
    "We saw Wales, Iceland, Northern Ireland qualify, some for the first time, some for first time in many years. The Netherlands always qualify, but they didn't. Qualifying created a whole new dynamic and hopefully we will do the same."
     
    #25
    QPR Oslo likes this.

Share This Page