1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

We've been charged by the FA...

Discussion in 'Hull City' started by originallambrettaman, Feb 14, 2017.

  1. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    107,867
    Likes Received:
    65,622
    Have you actually watched it?

    He glances down at him before he stamps on him, absolutely cast iron for me, got what he deserved.
     
    #161
  2. PLT

    PLT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    25,214
    Likes Received:
    13,686
    That's the point, it's not on Earth. Without any Earth to have a standing foot on how can you possibly stamp. All you can do is fall, and that's exactly what happened. The question is whether he deliberately made it fall onto Ibra's head or did it by accident as a result of being knocked by Rooney as he went over him and whilst looking the complete other way.
     
    #162
  3. SydneyTiger14

    SydneyTiger14 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2013
    Messages:
    20,395
    Likes Received:
    9,778
    <doh>

    People really do argue about the stupidest things on here sometimes.
     
    #163
  4. Amin Yapusi

    Amin Yapusi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    35,939
    Likes Received:
    15,914
    He deserved more. Stamping on someone's head is a stupidly ****ing dangerous thing to do at the best of times, never mind with studs on. I really don't know why footballers never face criminal prosecution for some of the things they do on the pitch. Get off the football pitch and people have been charged with attempted murder for head stamping. A 5 game ban is pathetic, he should never play again.
     
    #164
  5. Amin Yapusi

    Amin Yapusi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    35,939
    Likes Received:
    15,914
    I think you're the only person in the world who doesn't think it was clearly intentional.
     
    #165
  6. PLT

    PLT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    25,214
    Likes Received:
    13,686
    Well I've only watched the MOTD coverage and they were entirely unsure just as I am.

    I'm not even the only one on this thread.
     
    #166
  7. 4tiger

    4tiger Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    276
    Likes Received:
    121
    In my opinion there is absolutely no way you can say he definitely meant it.

    As someone has mentioned he could have been clever and tried to make it look like he didn't mean it.

    In my opinion though he's got Ibrahimovic lying on the floor in front of him, the balls gone out wide, Mings is wanting to run back to the goal, looked down to see where Ibrahimovic is so he can jump over him and then his focus has turned back to the ball and he's caught his head on the way down (certainly isn't a stamp!).

    I do not understand at all how it can be found as a deliberate stamp, the only person who really knows is Mings.
     
    #167
    PLT likes this.
  8. Amin Yapusi

    Amin Yapusi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    35,939
    Likes Received:
    15,914
    You are taking the piss?

    He knows Ibra is there then for good measure he looks down to make sure he hits the target and stamps on his head for christs sake.

    Not even a "sorry I might have crushed your skull, are you alright?"

    It's as cut and dry a deliberate action as you'll ever see. ****ing ridiculous to try and spin some fairytale to say otherwise. You're arguing that the grass is blue and the sky is green.
     
    #168
    Last edited: Mar 9, 2017
  9. djsowtz

    djsowtz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2012
    Messages:
    1,164
    Likes Received:
    576
    It's 100% deliberate imo too, he definitely has a sly glance at him, I've searched all the footage on google, and there's definitely one angle that clearly shows this, of course imo
     
    #169
  10. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    107,867
    Likes Received:
    65,622
    Bournemouth have been fined £35k for breaching anti-doping rules.

    A spokesman for Bournemouth said 'chill bro, don't lay no heavy **** on me'.
     
    #170

  11. dennisboothstash

    dennisboothstash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2011
    Messages:
    21,506
    Likes Received:
    32,362
    No they don't
     
    #171
  12. DocTigris

    DocTigris Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    296
    Likes Received:
    89
    Oh yes they do.
     
    #172
    dennisboothstash likes this.
  13. John Ex Aberdeen now E.R.

    John Ex Aberdeen now E.R. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    21,814
    Likes Received:
    19,450
    Man U got £20K fine same as us for not controlling their players.
     
    #173
  14. charon-the-ferryman

    charon-the-ferryman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    6,491
    Likes Received:
    7,267
    That's about the amount the pay for Rooney to go to sleep for one night
     
    #174
  15. John Ex Aberdeen now E.R.

    John Ex Aberdeen now E.R. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    21,814
    Likes Received:
    19,450
    I agree it is a derisory amount but it's not the amount, at least they got charged, as they should have been.
     
    #175
  16. Craigo

    Craigo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    7,289
    Likes Received:
    1,538
    Hello
    I will be awaiting news of the £20,000 fine the FA will impose on Manchester United for not controlling their players during the EFL Cup Final.
    The incident when several Manchester United players crowded the referee in an attempt to get Saints player Stephens booked was identical to the recent incident at The Emirates when Hull City was fined that same sum.
    Please forward this e-mail to the FA Ivory Tower HQ where the ‘friends of the top six teams’ congregate and tell them that ordinary football supporters will not be surprised by their next expected hypocrisy.
    Regards

    Their response (26/02/17):

    Dear Supporter,
    Thank you for contacting The Football Association.
    We will endeavour to respond to your query as soon as possible. However, please note that due to the large amounts of queries that we deal with it may take up to 5 working days to be dealt with.
    Kind regards,
    Customer Relations Team
    The FA Group
    Wembley Stadium, Wembley, London, HA9 0WS
    Postal address: Wembley Stadium, PO Box 1966, London, SW1P 9EQ
    T +44 (0) 844 980 8200 | F+44 (0) 844 980 8201

    No response 04/03/17):

    Dear Sir/ Madam
    I am still awaiting your response to my question regarding the expected
    charges against Manchester United for not controlling their players (when
    surrounding the referee in an attempt to get Southampton's Stephen's booked
    or sent off during the EFL Final).
    As mentioned there are numerous precedents of clubs being fined for exactly
    the same behaviour (including Hull City at The Emirates this season). So
    will you please respond promptly to my question in order to allay any
    possible suspicion of favouritism by the FA in such matters.
    Regards

    Their response 04/03/17

    Dear Supporter,

    Thank you for contacting The Football Association.

    We will endeavour to respond to your query as soon as possible. However, please note that due to the large amounts of queries that we deal with it may take up to 5 working days to be dealt with.


    Kind regards,

    Customer Relations Team
    The FA Group
    Wembley Stadium, Wembley, London, HA9 0WS
    Postal address: Wembley Stadium, PO Box 1966, London, SW1P 9EQ
    T +44 (0) 844 980 8200 | F+44 (0) 844 980 8201
    www.thefa.com, www.wembleystadium.com

    No further response
     
    #176
  17. Arnold_Lane_HCFC_

    Arnold_Lane_HCFC_ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2017
    Messages:
    544
    Likes Received:
    358
    Good work Agent Craigo.

    Next time you write, maybe you should mention that you are going to copy in Damian Collins or Tracey Crouch.

    Maybe chuck in a Freedom of Information Act request also, to inspect the 'Customer Relations Team' service level agreements to respond to customers requests.
     
    #177
    Craigo likes this.
  18. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    107,867
    Likes Received:
    65,622
    That would at least give them a laugh, the Freedom Of Information Act only applies to government run bodies.
     
    #178

Share This Page