Three promoted sides.

A pair of

please log in to view this image

 

Is it just me, or do others see the irony when HammersmithBlue, in a post regarding a discriminatory insult, describes the whole thing as 'a bit gay'....

 

Noted, also noted was swords backing him up.

 

Not with regards the childish "a bit gay" comment, just his general point that the whole scenario is a bit absurd.

 

Farce f**king farce we played one of the most successful teams of the last 10 years(spit) and we beat them fair and square.What so we're responsible for the indiscipline of our opponents?.
You're havin a laugh.scumsea's team of "superstars" were totally ill prepared for the atmosphere of hatred that greeted them.Yeah yeah I know so one all come along with a smiley and say
we ain't got an atmosphere or they're world class and have been on the biggest stages in world football,but you ask Mata who couldn't even take a corner or JT totally losing it and racially attacking Anton
the atmosphere got to em.Oh and we scored when it was 11v11,how did you get on?

 

Yeah wish we could play the AVB way....LOSERS!

 

QPR, Norwich and Swansea’s starts give them at least 76% survival chance

By Brian Sears

24 November 2011

As Swansea City’s manager Brendan Rodgers starts talks about a new contract, analysis by Sportingintelligence shows that Swansea and their fellow promoted teams in the Premier League – QPR and Norwich – each have at least a 76 per cent chance of survival this season, based on their decent starts.............http://www.sportingintelligence.com...give-them-at-least-76-survival-chance-241101/

 

bloody hell - toys out of pram or what!!

just cos i don't have the same opinion as you of that match doesn't make me wrong - you were watching from a totally biased point of view - i was not, and my view is pretty much the same view that 99% of neutrals would argue about that game. you were incredibly lucky to win on the day but win is what you did and thats all that matters.

 

Can I have my panda and action man ( the one eagle eyes and gripping hands) back now please!!!
good reply btw

 

Hammersmith are you still going on about that that game!

Firstly we did not kick you off the park it was the other way around.
Secondly, We went 1-0 when they had 11 men and were the better team up till then, anyone that thinks different knows nothing about football.
And lastly.
Chelsea have a top team and even with 9 men can still keep the ball well, so No i would not embarrassed not to thrash 9 men.
I would be more embarrassed having Delia as a chairman

 

You had 1 shot and it was a penalty

 

Did they not put 3 past you?

 

Just for accuracy, Delia is joint majority share holder. Our Chairman's name is Alan Bowkett.

 

2 on target 1 being a penalty, we conceded 3 at the Bridge

 

I wouldn't worry about this 'Donut' he gets a lot of things wrong. Just another bitter jealous 13 fingered muppet from 'Carrot Rd'.

 

Does that not count then?
FYI not so supernorwich
QPR stats v scum
Goals 1-0
attempts at goal QPR 8 Scum 13
on target QPR 3 scum3
Corners QPR 0 scum 6
offside QPR 6 scum 1
fouls QPR 17 scum 16
booked QPR 2 Scum 7
sent off QPR 0 scum 2
you should get facts right before opening your gob

 

Didn't they lose 7-1 at home not long ago and they all turned on an ex player who was manager?
7-1 at home?

 

We should call him 'StupidNorwich' from now on.

 

Blimey, did you buy a job lot of 'banter'? If it was any older it'd come with a ration book! A couple of months after that game, I believe you lost 5-1 at home. We appointed Lambert, you got Warnock. I think it's worked out quite well for both of us since then.