Ok, let's be be clear, I am NOT itk, But I do remember it being widely reported that we cannot (the club) make those decisions . That is how I understood the terms of deal works without the agreement of GFH. If I'm wrong, I completely apologie
No need to apologise pal, I was curious and thought you had read something. In the document filed at companies house there is no mention of that, just a fixed term repayment as Mighty pointed out. Radz can purchase Elland Road without permission from GFH and it won't increase their payment or share. Are you thinking back to when GFH owned 25%?
No mate. Am I am very happy if you're right but the original report, I read, was always that to do anything (asset) we had to pay the GFH charge first. If we don't why not do it? A PR dream surely