1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

The Breakfast Debate

Discussion in 'Leeds United' started by ellandback, May 24, 2017.

  1. Leedsoflondon

    Leedsoflondon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2014
    Messages:
    15,741
    Likes Received:
    17,516
    Ok, let's be be clear, I am NOT itk, But I do remember it being widely reported that we cannot (the club) make those decisions . That is how I understood the terms of deal works without the agreement of GFH. If I'm wrong, I completely apologie
     
    #181
  2. Leedsoflondon

    Leedsoflondon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2014
    Messages:
    15,741
    Likes Received:
    17,516
    I didn't know he did. Fair play <cheers>
     
    #182
  3. ristac

    ristac Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    25,547
    Likes Received:
    27,659
    No need to apologise pal, I was curious and thought you had read something.

    In the document filed at companies house there is no mention of that, just a fixed term repayment as Mighty pointed out.

    Radz can purchase Elland Road without permission from GFH and it won't increase their payment or share. Are you thinking back to when GFH owned 25%?
     
    #183
  4. Leedsoflondon

    Leedsoflondon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2014
    Messages:
    15,741
    Likes Received:
    17,516
    No mate. Am I am very happy if you're right but the original report, I read, was always that to do anything (asset) we had to pay the GFH charge first. If we don't why not do it? A PR dream surely
     
    #184
  5. Leedsoflondon

    Leedsoflondon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2014
    Messages:
    15,741
    Likes Received:
    17,516
    ****. Just read 'report'. Not the official club report I meant from journalists
     
    #185

Share This Page