1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Premier League to toughen ownership tests...

Discussion in 'Hull City' started by originallambrettaman, May 17, 2017.

  1. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    107,865
    Likes Received:
    65,617
    please log in to view this image


    The Premier League plans to toughen tests for owners and directors of England's leading football clubs in the wake of controversies surrounding proposed takeovers at Hull City and Southampton.

    Sky News has learnt that the bosses of the 20 Premier League clubs will be asked to vote at next month's annual meeting on a series of rule changes that will make it easier for the League to prevent clubs falling into the control of potentially unscrupulous owners.

    The move will come amid growing unease - both in football and in Westminster - about the influx of club owners who have often sought to keep details of their financial affairs beyond the scrutiny of the Premier League.

    There have also been growing objections to the number of clubs being bought by Chinese backers amid suggestions that there is a degree of opacity surrounding the ultimate ownership of some of those investors.

    The majority of top-flight clubs - including new Premier League champions Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool and Manchester United - have owners who are based overseas, while Aston Villa, Wolverhampton Wanderers and West Bromwich Albion are among the clubs now owned by Chinese shareholders.

    One Premier League club director said he had been briefed to expect details of a number of rule changes to be circulated ahead of the shareholder meeting, which takes place on 8 June.

    The first relates to the conduct of prospective owners who have been guilty of offences abroad that would have left them liable to criminal prosecution in Britain.

    Sources said the proposed amendment to Premier League rules would allow it to block club takeovers on that basis, following a move by Chinese businessman Gao Jisheng to take control of Southampton FC in a deal reported to be worth £200m.

    Mr Gao had admitted to bribery offences, but gave evidence for the prosecution in two separate cases, meaning that he escaped charges himself.

    Because he has not been convicted of an offence, the Premier League is understood to have no existing grounds to block his bid.

    The other principal change is said to relate to a more formal ability to prohibit would-be owners who are found to have provided misleading information about their finances to Premier League officials.

    One club source said this amendment had been inspired by recent events at Hull City FC, who were relegated from the Premier League last weekend.

    An attempt by Dai Yongge and Hawken Xiu Li, his sister, to buy Hull involved the use of a third party, who insisted that he controlled the relevant funds necessary to undertake the deal.

    It subsequently transpired that the finances were actually under the control of Mr Dai, with the Financial Times reporting last month that a Premier League investigation into him had raised several "red flags" over his commercial background.

    To complicate matters further, Mr Dai has now turned his attention to a takeover of Reading, which could win promotion to the Premier League if it wins the Championship Play-Off Final at Wembley later this month.

    Sources said the English Football League was likely to adopt similar changes.

    The Premier League's constitution means that a two-thirds majority of clubs - equating to 14 of the 20 'shareholders' - are required to vote in favour in order to approve the rule changes.

    Its rulebook already permits close scrutiny of the finances of club-owners whose business plans are deemed to be unsustainable by the Premier League.

    Clubs are permitted to overspend their budgets by £105m over a three-year period, providing they can demonstrate the viability of their financial forecasts, or that directors and financiers are prepared to write off their debts.

    One source said this area was also likely to be tightened, although the League already powers to impose draconian measures such as a transfer embargo.

    The Premier League has made incremental changes to what was known as the 'Fit and Proper Person Test' in the decade since Alexandre Gaydamak's tenure at Portsmouth led to the club's financial ruin.

    A Premier League spokesman declined to comment on Wednesday.

    http://news.sky.com/story/takeover-...-ownership-tests-10881228?dcmp=snt-sf-twitter
     
    #1
  2. Happy Tiger

    Happy Tiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    15,983
    Likes Received:
    7,359
    Genuinely be interesting to see what happens if Reading get promoted.
     
    #2
    ImperialTiger likes this.
  3. John Ex Aberdeen now E.R.

    John Ex Aberdeen now E.R. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    21,812
    Likes Received:
    19,447
    When do we cease being an EPL club, as will the Allam's be one of the 20 voting?
     
    #3
  4. PLT

    PLT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    25,214
    Likes Received:
    13,684
    Whilst it's obviously important, it's frustrating to see such an interest in blocking owners with potentially dodgy financial backgrounds, while seemingly progress is so slow on strengthening rules against owners running clubs into the ground.
     
    #4
    the_jiggler and SimonGraysJacket like this.
  5. SimonGraysJacket

    SimonGraysJacket Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,739
    Likes Received:
    2,248
    Whole thing smacks of.....great....Hull are down....how the **** do we ensure they cant come back up again......
     
    #5
    dennisboothstash likes this.
  6. SimonGraysJacket

    SimonGraysJacket Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,739
    Likes Received:
    2,248
    How about completely disregarding the rules in our case......
     
    #6
  7. Barchullona

    Barchullona Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2012
    Messages:
    29,658
    Likes Received:
    14,737
    Is there something in the water supply in Hull which makes everyone paranoid?
     
    #7
    PattyNchips2 and Stockholm Tiger like this.
  8. DMD

    DMD Eh?
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    61,114
    Likes Received:
    50,718

    Why are you asking? Do you know something?
     
    #8
  9. Barchullona

    Barchullona Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2012
    Messages:
    29,658
    Likes Received:
    14,737
    They will scrap concessions, move fans about, change the name of the club, tell the ones who don't like it that they are hooligans and can die when they want, take 4% interest per year on their loans...As all good owners, defended for a long time by many on here, some of who still are reluctant to listen to anything less than fulsome praise of them do.
     
    #9
  10. City Man

    City Man Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2016
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    8,886
    Who's saying that?

    Is that what everyone's saying?

    What's wrong with our water?
     
    #10
    dennisboothstash likes this.

  11. Barchullona

    Barchullona Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2012
    Messages:
    29,658
    Likes Received:
    14,737
    If I knew I wouldn't be asking. Maybe they add something which makes people ask questions they know the answer to as well.
     
    #11
  12. Barchullona

    Barchullona Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2012
    Messages:
    29,658
    Likes Received:
    14,737
    Now they are adding something which stops people pressing the reply button correctly.
     
    #12
  13. City Man

    City Man Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2016
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    8,886
    Who are they?
     
    #13
  14. dennisboothstash

    dennisboothstash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2011
    Messages:
    21,506
    Likes Received:
    32,362
    ...they really don't want us back do they!
     
    #14
    SimonGraysJacket likes this.
  15. Barchullona

    Barchullona Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2012
    Messages:
    29,658
    Likes Received:
    14,737

    City Man wants to know who are they?
     
    #15
    dennisboothstash likes this.
  16. SimonGraysJacket

    SimonGraysJacket Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,739
    Likes Received:
    2,248
    Just out of interest, if Reading win the play offs and the PL don't let them go up because of the dodgy chinese takeover, would the losing play off finalist get promoted or would we stay up.
    In fact just take the club names out of the equation, it just happens to be us finishing 18th this season, but what are the rules/contingency plans (if any) for this scenario going forward???
    I would hazard a guess that there is no plan, based solely on my general cynicism of football and spiralling paranoia.
     
    #16
  17. Barchullona

    Barchullona Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2012
    Messages:
    29,658
    Likes Received:
    14,737
    It is that entity responsible for everything. As in "they have cut my money", "they should be giving us more...""they should do something about...(insert whatever)", "they don't care about the likes of us".
     
    #17
  18. SimonGraysJacket

    SimonGraysJacket Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,739
    Likes Received:
    2,248
    The Premier League is the answer to all these questions.....
     
    #18
  19. Barchullona

    Barchullona Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2012
    Messages:
    29,658
    Likes Received:
    14,737
    As they haven't got their Golden Share yet then the PL concerns don't come into it as the takeover has gone ahead before that and got approval from the EFL. So it isn't a situation which will arise.
    They should have hung on as they could have had us. Of course the desire never have to deal with the Gruesome Twosome again would have ruled that out.
     
    #19
    SimonGraysJacket likes this.
  20. Barchullona

    Barchullona Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2012
    Messages:
    29,658
    Likes Received:
    14,737
    What? The PL is responsible for not doling out enough in benefits, repairing roads, sorting out traffic problems and generally sorting everything else out?
     
    #20

Share This Page