Well obviously you don't buy a player with that intention but he's turned out to be a flop so if they pay his wages then why not? I mean it just happens to be Cardiff but if it were another club nobody would bat an eyelid
Some have two, some have three, many third keepers have never actually played a league game for their club.
Most PL teams have 3 goalkeepers. So I'd suggest 3. The top 4 that only have 2 will more than likely have better academy prospects to fill in should the need arise. It's quite a specialised position and to be under resourced is a bit short sighted. Mannion may be able to fill the void, but I'd be worried about sticking a keeper in with little to no first team experience for us, particularly in this division. Chelsea have 2 Spurs have 4 Arsenal have 2 Man U have 2 Man City have 2 Southampton have 4 Burnley have 3 Leicester have 3 Watford have 2 Everton have 3 Swansea have 2 Liverpool have 3 West Brom have 3 Bournemouth have 3 West Ham have 3 Palace have 3 Stoke have 3 Hull have 2 (If Kuciak and McGregor go) Sunderland have 4 Boro have 3
Use your head, how many times have we ever had to use our third choice keeper? It's a waste of wages which could be used elsewhere
It's very rare that a third choice keeper is ever needed. Though there's a chance that we've had no joy shifting Kuciak and that's why we accepted an offer for McGregor.
Put it this way. You only need one keeper injured and one serving a suspension and we'd be in the ****. Use your head