glory ... never expected any answers from LUST which basically confirms why people are suspicious of them ... GC made a lot of noise on here and YEP and has now further undermined LUST by not delivering on his promises of answers at the meeting ... such a shame but I guess it shows the character of the man ... bye bye LUST, the day I hear you are trying to buy shares in Leeds I'll be all over you like a cheap suit ...
your questions were answered in full live on ustream, yes that does show the character of the man and also shows the agenda of those who chose to ignore that fact mate. where you and glory are concerned I waste my time as the answers don't suit you. that's the way it goes. MOT lads, remember what that means?
If your backer has a past they feel won't stand up to scrutiny (your words, at your meeting) then they have no business taking a stake in my football club. By not naming them how the feck did you answer BS's question. Just cos your gob is flapping and noise coming out you shouldn't confuse it with answering questions. Please note I wasn't one of those calling for you not to post. I like the fact you come here and make yourself look a complete tool.
Not sure who you meant this to but why should any of us be worried. You wouldn't worry me unless you were running at me aroused and naked. Btw you could have worn a clean tee shirt rather something so stained. You are supposed to representing your membership, we all know you have a problem with that but you could at least try. Let me guess you are an ordinary bloke with no washing machine training. If you are going tomorrow perhaps we could have that "chat" you wanted. Resign.
Glory, make your mind up!!! you rant about LUST making disclosures, now you rant about them not making disclosures! Take a chill pill.
As usual where GC is concerned I only want him to provide the answers he promised. I know, he is only an ordinary bloke not trained in openness and honesty. I even did as you requested and tuned in but only heard mutual backslapping, a bit of piss taking of none GC followers but precious little by way of new information about big issues.
Is this a new competition? Spot the autograph hunter? I reckon it's the bloke on the right - looks a bit starstruck
Not sure one of our major investors would appreciate whatever point GC was trying to be make with this.
Did it not cross your mind that (as announced) the mystery backer required anonimity at this stage & LUST are duly complying? Keep up, Glory!
The buyer "wants anonymity because he says he is worried about what press scrutiny will disclose". Now if you are comfortable with that fine, but not me. Perhaps it's GCs brother?