The disturbing thing is what they're doing with all of that information. They're using software which can analyse this sort of thing extremely accurately and come up with a profile instantly. Social media is used for this already and it's disturbingly pinpoint.
Interestingly, as i have a light and chairs outside of my room on the mine, the police protecting us tend to skin up out side of my room. I have noticed a number of the seeds that they disgard have taken root and plants about 6 inches high have appeared. As there are very few, if any pollenating insects at this altitude, I should become the proud owner of a significant number of Sensi bushes in about 4 months time. Unless of course the thieving police nick them or Spurlock takes up gold mining.
Not instantly (not yet) . And social media is "pinpoint" because the number of distinct/diverse things yer average person has an active interest in, is very small.
A mate of mine showed me his results from some Facebook analysis thing on the weekend. It nailed his views across the board, including some quite diverse ones on politics and religion. I can't remember what the app or site was though, unfortunately. Glad I don't use Facebook, though!
I do nothing that makes it easier to do "cross-referencing" . That means no use of the Google search engine, youtube etc when I am logged in to my gmail account etc. You can also ask your ISP if they have assigned you a atatic IP address, or see how their DHCP servers are generally working.
Now we're being told that Man Utd represent more than just the people of Manchester. It's tough to know which smartass comment to post in response: the ludicrous idea that cheering on Ajax makes me a terrorist sympathiser, or that Man Utd have done a fine job representing the people of Kent and Surrey for twenty years...
There's been a particularly odious debating tactic used by the far-right sockpuppets online that any criticism of the Tories slashing police or armed forces budgets for the past seven years is "exploiting dead children" to score some cheap political points. Just a reminder, this was the front page of yesterday's Sun
Yes lots of factors to consider, and clearly information cannot always be released that might compromise sources. BUT one would hope that the majority of people committing crime end up in court at some time or other. Therefore the scale of the problem should be to a great extent linked to the number of people up on terrorist offences, because regardless of what people might think, we are not in the habit of "disappearing" suspects. So even if the trials are held entirely or partially behind closed doors, we still see how many trials are taking place. And I'm also thinking that the security services want to be putting people in court because it both justifies their existence and makes the public feel a bit more secure in that something is being done. I have no doubt a vast amount is being done, and if lots of people are not getting convicted then it's because there aren't as many people to arrest as we might think.
Well that's a first: more than one left back in the squad Still doesn't explain the three right backs or four goalkeepers though... Meanwhile, I doubt anything can explain this level of moronity...
There's only one way to check, find another notable Twitter moron. So who wants to do the honours and ask this bloke? https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump
So we're playing a friendly to finish the season ? How bloody ludicrous. They all should be on the beach. A friendly on June 13th .