A not606 SAFC first XI?

As we are stuck for our “fix” for a while, the threads seem to be getting wackier and wilder, so I thought I’d continue in the same vein.

If we had to field a not606 team – against other not606 boards – who would be in your starting XI, and why?

For me, a few I would suggest are…

GK – Syd – safest pair of hands around, commands his area
DM – psycho – nuff said
RW – BigChris – Oh, I forgot we got rid of him (he was a natural right wingher though)
LW – Cest (as above), but natural left winger.
Striker – StanCummins (scores a few against opponents - but propensity to get red cards!!)

Anybody with suggestions? Also, and a bit controversial – who would you like to see
a) moved on in the window, and
b) brought in – I understand that bartons tash is being touted around?

All ridiculing comments will be deleted – oh I forgot that’s 606 and not not606 – if you see what I mean.

 

BillySmarts in defence for sure, he's always defending his brilliant smoochy smoochy I love you so so much Jordan Henderson against valid criticism.

Or stick him at LB, after all, he should have been left back on 606

 

bigdownunder in attack because we have always liked a player who we can take the piss out of

 

HairyHaggis as the AMC... I would be the Haggis in the "Hole".

 

i am a helmet

 

You can have Barton's Tash on a free (Compensation wont be necessary,) he'll love this formation lark.

 

bruceysbeak - absolute magic!!

 

.

 

Cheers Myrtle - have you seen what BB is doing on the Bigdownunderthread, classic Think we've found THE way to get rid of the tools if they go too far!!

 

I know.......it's bad........sorry!

 

I'd say get your jacket mate, but you don't deserve it.

Out in the cold in your vest bonny lad!

 

I know I live down south, but it's still chuffin freezing, can I come in now?

 

Careful Dorset - he don't pay his leccy.

 

Go on then, you're forgiven!

Cheeky git, to the contrary, i paid the buggar 3 times, unwittingly i admit.