Also this is a very good article.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/sep/23/gambling-addiction-poker-ranjit-bolt
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/sep/23/gambling-addiction-poker-ranjit-bolt
Very timely and very worthwhile well done chaps.
As a relative newbie here, this is my feedback.
.
.
.
One thing I've had to be careful of is the frustration of a missed opportunity and then trying to do one better than the one you missed; very dangerous.
The "if only" and "should've" feeling is quite powerful and is actually, I think, likelier to cause trouble (at least for me).
The buzz of a win gives me a smug self satisfaction; the frustration of a missed win entices me to make bets I wouldn't otherwise have looked at.
The way I look at multiples is to gauge whether I would stake a certain amount as a single bet on any one of the selections. Eg if I had 4 selections and one was odds on, would I stake all the potential winnings from the other 3 on the odds on shot? The answer would almost certainly be NO. So why include it. I would apply that thinking to all the selections. Therefore I only believe in single bets, giving me the opportunity to decide on the stake (if any) on the next one. A multiple bet is an unnecessary commitment. Actually, I don't bet; but if I did ..............How true was this over the last 4 days!!!
I need to rediscover the betting patterns that got me a good return last season; that will mean less multiples and more sensible priced singles where I would always play the value angle; there I've said it, now I need to stick to it ( no pun intended ).
Very interesting reading chaps.
It's a funny old thing gambling and addiction. They go hand in hand. I don't believe anyone when they say they can leave it alone whenever they want.
I usually spend all my Summer's avoiding horse racing apart from the odd big race or day out at York.
How true was this over the last 4 days!!!
I need to rediscover the betting patterns that got me a good return last season; that will mean less multiples and more sensible priced singles where I would always play the value angle; there I've said it, now I need to stick to it ( no pun intended ).
The way I look at multiples is to gauge whether I would stake a certain amount as a single bet on any one of the selections. Eg if I had 4 selections and one was odds on, would I stake all the potential winnings from the other 3 on the odds on shot? The answer would almost certainly be NO. So why include it. I would apply that thinking to all the selections. Therefore I only believe in single bets, giving me the opportunity to decide on the stake (if any) on the next one. A multiple bet is an unnecessary commitment. Actually, I don't bet; but if I did ..............
A long time ago, with the aid of Timeform Horses to Follow and their weekly Black Book, I had a fiver on a 4 horse accumulator. The first one won at 8/1 the other 3 were favs and the last one had to survive a photo and stewards enquiry. Returned £500. I tried it again and failed and decided not to give it all back. I stopped betting altogether shortly after; but I had a stable tip for a beautifully bred newcomer that was "going to win and would never be odds against again". It was odds on and I lost £100 on that - and it never won a race subsequently. The only time I bet is a budgeted stake when I go to the races and that is rare. Didn't have a bet at Cheltenham and won't be having one on the Grand National. But I enjoy just as much, if not more, trying to pick winners and watching them on TV where possible. I love going to race meetings where the best horses run but sadly I don't get the time these daysI agree multiple bets can be very costly as they very rarely (in my experience) come in.
a few years ago at Cheltenham I did have one of my most successful bets though when I had a winning lucky 15 bet (included Zarakandar and Bobs Worth I think)
I suddenly though this is easy! and started having lots of lucky 15 bets which all of course lost!!
I now limit those to 1 lucky 15 bet each Cheltenham festival.
Really great thread and good to share guys.
I sometimes wonder, what defines an addict? Although I don't gamble everyday and very, very rarely during flat season I would say I am an addict. When the NH season arrives I absorb as much information, reading articles and checking results, almost cutting myself off from the loved ones around me.
A little over 5 years ago I won £14k in the space of 6 days - I gave it back and much more within a month. That's what makes me an addict, that lack of self control or restraint and no doubt it could happen again - although I'm determined not to allow it to. My inability at that time to walk away with a large amount of money in my pocket and just say "Enough" disgusts me but I'm done with torturing myself about it, it happened and I have dealt with it,
I would say greed and the need to be 'right' about an outcome are the driving forces of my own addiction.


Priorities sorted..... Last Saturday afternoon I took my son shopping for some new shoes - a much more enjoyable way to become a few Euros worse off than backing a loser in the Midlands National![]()
I sometimes wonder, what defines an addict?
So much depends on what you like most, horse racing or betting.